Reproduction of the Independent Auditor’s Report

To MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany

Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report

Audit Opinions

We have audited the Consolidated Financial Statements of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany, and its subsidiaries (the Group) which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2025, the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of changes in equity and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2025, and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including material accounting policy information. We have not audited the content of the compensation report in accordance with section 162 German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) referenced in sections 33 and 46 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, we have audited the Combined Management Report for the parent and the group of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany, for the financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2025. In accordance with the German legal requirements, we have not audited the content of the (Group) sustainability report pursuant to section 289b to section 289e as well as sections 315b and 315c German Commercial Code (HGB) included in the Combined Management Report, nor the corporate governance statement pursuant to sections 289f and 315d HGB referenced in the Combined Management Report. In addition, we have not audited the content of the disclosures in the Combined Management Report that are marked as extraneous to management reports.

In our opinion, on the basis of the knowledge obtained in the audit,

the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements comply, in all material respects, with the IFRS^® Accounting Standards issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) (hereinafter “IFRS Accounting Standards”) as adopted by the EU and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to section 315e (1) HGB and, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities and financial position of the Group as at December 31, 2025 and of its financial performance for the financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2025. Our audit opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements does not cover the content of the compensation report referred to above.
the accompanying Combined Management Report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position. In all material respects, this Combined Management Report is consistent with the Consolidated Financial Statements, complies with German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. Our audit opinion on the Combined Management Report does not cover the content of the statements referred to above and of the disclosures extraneous to management reports.

Pursuant to section 322 (3) sentence 1 HGB, we declare that our audit has not led to any reservations relating to the legal compliance of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report.

Basis for the Audit Opinions

We conducted our audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report in accordance with section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation (No. 537/2014; referred to subsequently as “EU Audit Regulation”) and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW). Our responsibilities under those requirements and principles are further described in the “Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report” section of our auditor’s report. We are independent of the group entities in accordance with the requirements of European law and German commercial and professional law and the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants (including International Independence Standards) of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA Code), and we have fulfilled our other German professional responsibilities in accordance with these requirements and the IESBA Code. In addition, in accordance with Article 10 (2) point (f) of the EU Audit Regulation, we declare that we have not provided non-audit services prohibited under Article 5 (1) of the EU Audit Regulation. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and on the Combined Management Report.

Key Audit Matters in the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements

Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2025. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements as a whole and in forming our audit opinion thereon; we do not provide a separate audit opinion on these matters.

In the following we present the key audit matters we have determined in the course of our audit:

Accounting treatment of the acquisition of SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc., USA
Recoverability of goodwill of the Life Science and Electronics business sectors
Completeness and measurement of income tax liabilities

Our presentation of these key audit matters has been structured as follows:

description (including reference to corresponding information in the Consolidated Financial Statements) and
auditor’s response

1. Accounting treatment of the acquisition of SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc., USA

On July 1, 2025, the Group acquired all of the shares in SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc., USA, (SpringWorks) for a total purchase price of mUSD 3,778 (mEUR 3,207). The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with IFRS 3 using the acquisition method. The acquired assets and liabilities assumed were recognized at fair values at the date of acquisition. These were determined as part of the purchase price allocation on the basis of a preliminary valuation report prepared by an external expert of the executive directors of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany. The identified assets recognized at the acquisition date mainly comprise intangible assets (mEUR 2,696). Taking into account the total purchase price of mEUR 3,207 and the remeasured net assets of mEUR 2,627, goodwill amounted to mEUR 580 (18.1% of the consideration transferred)
The identification and measurement of assets and liabilities, in particular intangible assets, are complex operations and are based on the executive directors’ judgment and assumptions. Various assumptions must be made, particularly in the context of measurement, in order to determine future cash flows derived from asset-specific revenue, margin and license rate expectations and the discount interest rate used. Against the background of the aspects explained above and the associated risk of material misstatements in the assets, liabilities, financial position and financial performance, this matter was of particular significance in our audit.
The disclosures of the executive directors on the acquisition of SpringWorks can be found in Note 6 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As part of our audit of the preliminary accounting treatment of the acquisition of SpringWorks, we first looked into the contractual agreements, obtained an understanding thereof, and compared the determined total purchase price with the evidence presented to us. In addition, we assessed – by calling in our internal valuation specialists – the methodological approach of the external expert of the executive directors with regard to the identification of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed, and assessed the valuation models used, taking into account the requirements of IFRS 3 with respect to methodological appropriateness and mathematical accuracy. We have assessed the significant assumptions and judgment, such as growth rates, discount rates, license rates or residual useful lives, for determining the fair values of the identified assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, to determine whether these correspond to general and company or industry-specific market expectations. We assessed the corporate planning underlying the measurement and compared the corresponding fair values with the assumptions and expectations of external expert market participants at the time of acquisition. In this respect, an area of audit focus was on the determination of the fair values of the intangible assets. We inspected the measurement report, taking into account our evaluation of the competence, capabilities, and objectivity of the external expert engaged by the executive directors, and used it in the course of our audit. We also reviewed the initial consolidation recorded in the consolidation system and examined whether the disclosures required by IFRS 3 relating to the business combination of SpringWorks in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements are appropriate.

2. Recoverability of goodwill of the Life Science and Electronics business sectors

In the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2025 of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany, the amount stated under the balance sheet item “Goodwill” is mEUR 17,934 (34.8% of the Group’s total assets), with mEUR 11,605 attributable to the Life Science business sector and mEUR 4,223 attributable to the Electronics business sector. The Life Science and Electronics business sectors each constitute a cash-generating unit.
The recoverability of goodwill of the Life Science and Electronics cash-generating units was a key matter in our audit because we identified an increased impairment risk for these business sectors as part of our risk assessment. The impairment test for the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements is based on a respective valuation of the Life Science and Electronics business sectors that involves discounting the planned future cash flows for these business sectors at the respective weighted average cost of capital using a discounted cash flow model. The planned cash flows are derived from the respective medium-term planning for the business sectors approved by the executive directors, which is extrapolated based on assumed long-term growth rates.
The result of these valuations highly depends on the executive directors’ judgmental determination of future cash flows and discount rates for the business sectors and is therefore subject to considerable uncertainties. Therefore, and as a result of our risk assessment, this matter was of particular significance in our audit.
The disclosures of the executive directors on goodwill can be found in Note 18 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Among others, in our audit we obtained an understanding of the accounting-relevant controls included in the process and reproduced the methodological approach to performing the impairment tests. Where identified controls were relevant for our audit, we had their design and implementation tested. Where estimates were made by the executive directors, we assessed whether the methods applied, assumptions made and data used were acceptable. Regarding the projection of future cash flows, we firstly evaluated the reliability of the respective planning by reviewing the past adherence to planning, walked through the underlying planning process and conducted a critical assessment. Subsequently, we evaluated the appropriateness of the future cash flows used in the valuation, especially by comparing these figures with the medium-term planning approved by the executive directors and by reconciling selected planning assumptions with general, company and industry-specific market expectations. We obtained a deep understanding of the parameters applied in determining the discount rates used, evaluated the completeness and accuracy of the calculation schemes and had them compared with general and industry-specific market expectations. Furthermore, due to the material significance of goodwill, we performed an additional own sensitivity analysis for the cash-generating units (comparison of carrying amount with recoverable amount). As part of our audit, we were supported by internal valuation experts. With their help, we reproduced the methodological approach to impairment testing, the arithmetical correctness of the valuation models as well as the determination of the discount rates used

3. Completeness and measurement of income tax liabilities

As at December 31, 2025, the amount recognized for income tax liabilities including liabilities for uncertain tax obligations is mEUR 1,614.
The Group operates in different jurisdictions with different legal systems. The application of local tax regulations and tax incentives as well as transfer pricing rules is very demanding given their complexity. The recognition and measurement of income tax liabilities require the executive directors to exercise judgment in assessing tax matters and to make estimates regarding uncertain tax positions. In order to reinforce and/or validate their own risk assessment, the executive directors have engaged external experts on a case-by-case basis. There is a risk for the Consolidated Financial Statements that income tax liabilities are not fully recognized or not appropriately measured. For these reasons, this matter was of particular significance in our audit.
The disclosures of the executive directors on the recognition and measurement of income tax liabilities can be found in Note 15 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Among other things, as part of our audit we obtained an understanding of the process and of the accounting-relevant controls included in the process and involved our own tax experts in the audit team regarding national and international tax law in order to evaluate the executive directors’ judgments and estimates as well as the assessment of the engaged external experts, if applicable. Where identified controls were relevant for our audit, we had their design and implementation tested.
We obtained an understanding of existing tax risks through inquiries of employees in the tax department. We assessed the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the external experts and evaluated their expert opinions.
Furthermore, we analyzed the correspondence with the competent tax authorities and assessed the assumptions for determining income tax liabilities based on our knowledge and experience of how the relevant legal requirements are currently applied by tax authorities and courts. We used a risk-based audit approach to audit the accuracy of the calculation of the income tax liabilities.

Other Information

The executive directors and/or the supervisory board are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises

the report of the supervisory board,
the compensation report pursuant to section 162 AktG,
the (Group) sustainability report
the corporate governance statement referred to in the Combined Management Report,
the TCFD reporting referred to in the Combined Management Report,
the other content of the Combined Management Report marked as extraneous to management reports,
the executive directors’ confirmations in accordance with section 297 (2) sentence 4 and section 315 (1) sentence 5 HGB regarding the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report, and
all other parts of the annual report,
but not the Consolidated Financial Statements, not the audited content of the disclosures in the Combined Management Report and not our auditor’s report thereon.

The supervisory board is responsible for the report of the supervisory board. The executive directors and the supervisory board are responsible for the statement according to section 161 AktG concerning the German Corporate Governance Code, which is part of the corporate governance statement, and for the compensation report. Otherwise, the executive directors are responsible for the other information.

Our audit opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and on the Combined Management Report do not cover the other information, and consequently we do not express an audit opinion or any other form of assurance conclusion thereon.

In connection with our audit, our responsibility is to read the other information identified above and, in doing so, to consider whether the other information:

Is materially inconsistent with the Consolidated Financial Statements, with the audited content of the disclosures in the Combined Management Report or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or
Otherwise appears to be materially misstated.

Responsibilities of the Executive Directors and the Supervisory Board for the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report

The executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements that comply, in all material respects, with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU and the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to section 315e (1) HGB, and that the Consolidated Financial Statements, in compliance with these requirements, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and financial performance of the Group. In addition, the executive directors are responsible for such internal control as they have determined necessary to enable the preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud (i.e., fraudulent financial reporting and misappropriation of assets) or error.

In preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements, the executive directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. They also have the responsibility for disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern. In addition, they are responsible for financial reporting based on the going concern basis of accounting unless there is an intention to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or there is no realistic alternative but to do so.

Furthermore, the executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the Combined Management Report that as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and is, in all material respects, consistent with the Consolidated Financial Statements, complies with German legal requirements, and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development. In addition, the executive directors are responsible for such arrangements and measures (systems) as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of a Combined Management Report that is in accordance with the applicable German legal requirements, and to be able to provide sufficient appropriate evidence for the assertions in the Combined Management Report.

The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the Group’s financial reporting process for the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report.

Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report

Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the Consolidated Financial Statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and whether the Combined Management Report as a whole provides an appropriate view of the Group’s position and, in all material respects, is consistent with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the knowledge obtained in the audit, complies with the German legal requirements and appropriately presents the opportunities and risks of future development, as well as to issue an auditor’s report that includes our audit opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and on the Combined Management Report.

Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with section 317 HGB and the EU Audit Regulation and in compliance with German Generally Accepted Standards for Financial Statement Audits promulgated by the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW) will always detect a material misstatement. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these Consolidated Financial Statements and this Combined Management Report.

We exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of arrangements and measures relevant to the audit of the Combined Management Report in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an audit opinion on the effectiveness of internal control or these arrangements and measures of the Group.
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used by the executive directors and the reasonableness of estimates made by the executive directors and related disclosures.
Conclude on the appropriateness of the executive directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in the auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the Consolidated Financial Statements and in the Combined Management Report or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our respective audit opinions. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to be able to continue as a going concern.
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the Consolidated Financial Statements, including the disclosures, and whether the Consolidated Financial Statements present the underlying transactions and events in a manner that the Consolidated Financial Statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and financial performance of the Group in compliance with IFRS Accounting Standards as adopted by the EU and with the additional requirements of German commercial law pursuant to section 315e (1) HGB.
Plan and perform the audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements in order to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or of the business activities within the Group, which serves as a basis for forming audit opinions on the Consolidated Financial Statements and on the Combined Management Report. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and review of the audit procedures performed for the purposes of the group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinions.
Evaluate the consistency of the Combined Management Report with the Consolidated Financial Statements, its conformity with German law, and the view of the Group’s position it provides.
Perform audit procedures on the prospective information presented by the executive directors in the Combined Management Report. On the basis of sufficient appropriate audit evidence we evaluate, in particular, the significant assumptions used by the executive directors as a basis for the prospective information, and evaluate the proper derivation of the prospective information from these assumptions. We do not express a separate audit opinion on the prospective information and on the assumptions used as a basis. There is a substantial unavoidable risk that future events will differ materially from the prospective information.

We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.

We provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with the relevant independence requirements, and communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, the actions taken or safeguards applied to eliminate independence threats.

From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in the auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter.

Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

Report on the Assurance on the Electronic Reproductions of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report Prepared for Publication Pursuant to section 317 (3a) HGB

Asssurance Opinion

We have performed assurance work in accordance with section 317 (3a) HGB to obtain reasonable assurance whether the electronic reproductions of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report (hereinafter referred to as “ESEF documents”) prepared for publication, contained in the file, which has the SHA-256 value b9920d75a2c2f7ae303eb16e445967d07f4fd0eac99df391aa23814647823fa2, meet, in all material respects, the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to section 328 (1) HGB (“ESEF format”). In accordance with the German legal requirements, this assurance work only covers the conversion of the information contained in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report into the ESEF format, and therefore covers neither the information contained in these electronic reproductions, nor any other information contained in the file identified above.

In our opinion, the electronic reproductions of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report prepared for publication contained in the file identified above meet, in all material respects, the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to section 328 (1) HGB. Beyond this assurance opinion and our audit opinions on the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and on the accompanying Combined Management Report for the financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2025 contained in the “Report on the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report” above, we do not express any assurance opinion on the information contained within these electronic reproductions or on any other information contained in the file identified above.

Basis for the Assurance Opinions

We conducted our assurance work on the electronic reproductions of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report contained in the file identified above in accordance with section 317 (3a) HGB and on the basis of the IDW Assurance Standard: Assurance Work on the Electronic Reproductions of Financial Statements and Management Reports Prepared for Publication Purposes Pursuant to section 317 (3a) HGB (IDW AuS 410 (06.2022)). Our responsibilities in this context are further described in the “Group Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Assurance Work on the ESEF Documents” section. Our audit firm has applied the requirements of the IDW Quality Management Standards.

Responsibilities of the Executive Directors and the Supervisory Board for the ESEF Documents

The executive directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation of the ESEF documents based on the electronic files of the Consolidated Financial Statements and of the Combined Management Report according to section 328 (1) sentence 4 no. 1 HGB and for the tagging of the Consolidated Financial Statements according to section 328 (1) sentence 4 no. 2 HGB.

In addition, the executive directors of the Company are responsible for such internal control that they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of ESEF documents that are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements for the electronic reporting format pursuant to section 328 (1) HGB.

The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the process for preparing the ESEF documents as part of the financial reporting process.

Group Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Assurance Work on the ESEF Documents

Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ESEF documents are free from material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of section 328 (1) HGB. We exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the assurance work. We also:

Identify and assess the risks of material intentional or unintentional non-compliance with the requirements of section 328 (1) HGB, design and perform assurance procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain assurance evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our assurance opinion.
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the assurance on the ESEF documents in order to design assurance procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an assurance opinion on the effectiveness of these controls.
Evaluate the technical validity of the ESEF documents, i.e., whether the file containing the ESEF documents meets the requirements of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815, in the version in force at the balance sheet date, on the technical specification for this electronic file.
Evaluate whether the ESEF documents enable an XHTML reproduction with content equivalent to the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and to the audited Combined Management Report.
Evaluate whether the tagging of the ESEF documents with Inline XBRL technology (iXBRL) in accordance with the requirements of Articles 4 and 6 of the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/815, in the version in force at the balance sheet date, enables an appropriate and complete machine-readable XBRL copy of the XHTML reproduction.

Further Information pursuant to Article 10 of the EU Audit Regulation

We were elected as group auditor by the general meeting on April 25, 2025. We were engaged by the supervisory board on June 27, 2025. We have been the group auditor of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany, without interruption since the financial year 2023.

We declare that the audit opinions expressed in this auditor’s report are consistent with the additional report to the audit committee pursuant to Article 11 of the EU Audit Regulation (long-form audit report).

Other Matter – Use of the Auditor’s Report

Our auditor’s report must always be read together with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the audited Combined Management Report as well as with the assured ESEF documents. The Consolidated Financial Statements and the Combined Management Report converted into the ESEF format – including the versions to be submitted for inclusion in the Company Register – are merely electronic reproductions of the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the audited Combined Management Report and do not take their place. In particular, the ESEF report and our assurance opinion contained therein are to be used solely together with the assured ESEF documents made available in electronic form.

German Public Auditor Responsible for the Engagement

The German Public Auditor responsible for the engagement is Daniel Weise.

Frankfurt am Main, Germany, February 18, 2026

Deloitte GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Signed:

Christoph Schenk
Wirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor)

Signed:

Daniel Weise
Wirtschaftsprüfer
(German Public Auditor)

Assurance Report of the Independent German Public Auditor on a Limited Assurance Engagement in Relation to the Combined Sustainability Statement

To MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany

Assurance Conclusion

We have conducted a limited assurance engagement on the Sustainability Statement of MERCK Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien, Darmstadt, Germany, combining the Consolidated Sustainability Statement and the Non-Financial Statement of the parent, included in section (Group) Sustainability Statement of the Combined Management Report for the parent and the group, for the financial year from January 1 to December 31, 2025 (hereafter referred to as “the Combined Sustainability Statement”). The Combined Sustainability Statement was prepared to fulfill the requirements of Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of December 14, 2022 (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, CSRD) and Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and Sections 289b to 289e, 315b and 315c German Commercial Code (HGB) for a combined non-financial statement.

Not subject to our assurance engagement are

the references to information of the Company outside of the Combined Management Report marked as unassured, and
the following references in the Combined Sustainability Statement to assurance reports or long-form reports of other practitioners in relation to the assurance of information from sources within the value chain contained in the Combined Sustainability Statement:
- ISO certifications issued by external audit firms (ISO 14001, ISO 45001, ISO 9001 and ISO 5001)
- Supplier audits by the Together for Sustainability (TfS) initiative including publicly available information provided by EcoVadis
- Audit evaluations in accordance with the Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (RMAP) standard
- Audits at mica suppliers conducted by the Indo-German Export Promotion project (IGEP)

Based on the procedures performed and the evidence obtained, nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the Combined Sustainability Statement is not prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the requirements of the CSRD and Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, Sections 289b to 289e, 315b and 315c HGB for a combined non-financial statement, and the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company.

This assurance conclusion includes that nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe

that the Consolidated Sustainability Statement included in the accompanying Combined Sustainability Statement does not comply, in all material respects, with the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), including that the process carried out by the entity to identify information to be included in the Consolidated Sustainability Statement (the materiality assessment) is not, in all material respects, in accordance with the description set out in section General Disclosures of the Consolidated Sustainability Statement, or
that the disclosures in the Combined Sustainability Statement do not comply, in all material respects, with Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852.

We do not express an assurance conclusion on the above-mentioned parts of the Combined Sustainability Statement that were not covered by our assurance engagement.

Basis for the Assurance Conclusion

We conducted our assurance engagement in accordance with the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 (Revised): “Assurance Engagements Other Than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information”, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB).

The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from, and are less in extent than for, a reasonable assurance engagement. Consequently, the level of assurance obtained is substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed.

Our responsibilities under ISAE 3000 (Revised) are further described in section “German Public Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Assurance Engagement on the Combined Sustainability Statement”.

We are independent of the entity in accordance with the requirements of European law and German commercial and professional law, and we have fulfilled our other German professional responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. Our audit firm has applied the requirements of the IDW Quality Management Standards and of the International Standard on Quality Management (ISQM) 1 issued by the IAASB. We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our assurance conclusion.

Responsibilities of the Executive Directors and the Supervisory Board for the Combined Sustainability Statement

The executive directors are responsible for the preparation of the Combined Sustainability Statement in accordance with the requirements of the CSRD and the applicable German legal and other European requirements as well as with the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company and for designing, implementing and maintaining such internal control as they have considered necessary to enable the preparation of a combined sustainability statement in accordance with these requirements that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud (i.e., fraudulent reporting in the Combined Sustainability Statement) or error.

This responsibility of the executive directors includes establishing and maintaining the materiality assessment process, selecting and applying appropriate reporting policies for preparing the Combined Sustainability Statement as well as making assumptions and estimates and ascertaining forward-looking information for individual sustainability-related disclosures.

The supervisory board is responsible for overseeing the process for the preparation of the Combined Sustainability Statement.

Inherent Limitations in Preparing the Combined Sustainability Statement

The CSRD and the applicable German legal and other European requirements contain wording and terms that are subject to considerable interpretation uncertainties and for which no authoritative comprehensive interpretations have yet been published. The executive directors have disclosed interpretations of such wording and terms in the Combined Sustainability Statement.

The executive directors are responsible for the reasonableness of these interpretations. As such wording and terms may be interpreted differently by regulators or courts, the legality of measurements or evaluations of the sustainability matters based on these interpretations is uncertain. The quantification of non-financial performance indicators disclosed in the Combined Sustainability Statement is also subject to inherent uncertainties.

These inherent limitations also affect the assurance engagement on the Combined Sustainability Statement.

German Public Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Assurance Engagement on the Combined Sustainability Statement

Our objective is to express a limited assurance conclusion, based on the assurance engagement we have conducted, on whether any matters have come to our attention that cause us to believe that the Combined Sustainability Statement has not been prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the CSRD, the applicable German legal and other European requirements and the specifying criteria presented by the executive directors of the Company and to issue an assurance report that includes our assurance conclusion on the Combined Sustainability Statement.

As part of a limited assurance engagement in accordance with ISAE 3000 (Revised), we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism. We also

obtain an understanding of the process used to prepare the Combined Sustainability Statement, including the materiality assessment process carried out by the entity to identify the disclosures to be reported in the Combined Sustainability Statement.
identify disclosures where a material misstatement due to fraud or error is likely to arise, design and perform procedures to address these disclosures and obtain limited assurance to support the assurance conclusion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations or the override of internal control. In addition, the risk of not detecting a material misstatement in information obtained from sources not within the entity’s control (value chain information) is ordinarily higher than the risk of not detecting a material misstatement in information obtained from sources within the entity’s control, as both the entity’s executive directors and we as practitioners are ordinarily subject to restrictions on direct access to the sources of the value chain information.
consider the forward-looking information, including the appropriateness of the underlying assumptions. There is a substantial unavoidable risk that future events will differ materially from the forward-looking information.

Summary of the Work Performed by the German Public Auditor

A limited assurance engagement involves the performance of procedures to obtain evidence about the sustainability information. The nature, timing and extent of the selected procedures are subject to our professional judgment.

In performing our limited assurance engagement, we

evaluated the suitability of the criteria as a whole presented by the executive directors in the Combined Sustainability Statement.
inquired of the executive directors and relevant employees involved in the preparation of the Combined Sustainability Statement about the preparation process, including the materiality assessment process carried out by the entity to identify the disclosures to be reported in the Combined Sustainability Statement, and about the internal controls related to this process.
evaluated the reporting policies used by the executive directors to prepare the Combined Sustainability Statement.
evaluated the reasonableness of the estimates and related information provided by the executive directors. If, in accordance with the ESRS, the executive directors estimate the value chain information to be reported for a case in which the executive directors are unable to obtain the information from the value chain despite making reasonable efforts, our assurance engagement is limited to evaluating whether the executive directors have undertaken these estimates in accordance with the ESRS and assessing the reasonableness of these estimates, but does not include identifying information in the value chain that the executive directors were unable to obtain.
performed analytical procedures or tests of details and made inquiries in relation to selected information in the Combined Sustainability Statement.
conducted site visits.
considered the presentation of the information in the Combined Sustainability Statement.
considered the process for identifying taxonomy-eligible and taxonomy-aligned economic activities and the corresponding disclosures in the Combined Sustainability Statement.

Restriction of Use

We issue this report as stipulated in the engagement letter agreed with the Company (including the “General Engagement Terms for Wirtschaftsprüferinnen, Wirtschaftsprüfer and Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften (German Public Auditors and Public Audit Firms)” dated January 1, 2024 of the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer (IDW)). We draw attention to the fact that the assurance engagement was conducted for the Company’s purposes and that the report is intended solely to inform the Company about the result of the assurance engagement. Consequently, it may not be suitable for any other than the aforementioned purpose. Accordingly, the report is not intended to be used by third parties as a basis for making (financial) decisions.

Our responsibility is to the Company alone. We do not accept any responsibility to third parties. Our assurance conclusion is not modified in this respect.